Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Kevin and Britney - Surprise Custody Hearing

Surprise! Britney Spears and Kevin Federline had an unscheduled custody hearing today in Los Angeles County Superior Court.

Both attorneys were present in the courtroom, but would not comment about what they discussed, neither would a spokesperson for the Courts.

Last week, Commissioner Scott Gordon amended his original order and allowed Brit Brit to have one night a week of overnight visitation with her sons.

Both Spears and Federline must appear before the Commish on Oct. 26 for another hearing on custody.

Source: tmz.com

(Another) Surprise Hearing in the Brit/K-Fed Custody Case
Wednesday October 17, 2007

Kevin Federline's attorney, Mark Vincent Kaplan, called for an ex-parte hearing in Federline and Britney Spears' ongoing custody battle this morning in Los Angeles Superior Court. Spears' attorneys were notified, and legal representatives for both parties were present by 9:20 a.m. Judge Scott M. Gordon sealed the courtroom, which let out an hour later.

Though Spears and Federline were not present today, they are required to be in court for their next scheduled hearing on October 26. (Hopefully, by then, Brit will be over her tiff with her judge.)

Currently, Federline has custody of their sons, Sean Preston, 2, and Jayden James, 1. Spears has been given visitation rights, including a hard-won overnight visit, but she must be supervised by a court-appointed monitor. Additionally, she has been ordered by the court to submit to drug tests, and attend counseling and parenting classes.

Source: usmagazine.com

10 comments:

Anonymous said...

Could be anything really. We'll see if any news comes out of it, if not it's not too long until the 26th.

Anonymous said...

Good. Maybe the court will finally hear about KFed the drug addict.

Anonymous said...

he is a drug addict why would the kids live with a drug addict - not a responsible father to be around his kids when they see it

Samantha said...

4:48pm and 4:49pm:

you are most likely the same person. Either way, your ignorance is really overwhelming. He's not a drug addict, uhm which parent was the 1 orderd to undergo random drug tests? britney. which parent went into and out of rehab three times? britney. Which parent flashes uncontrollably to the extend everyone is overly disgusted? britney. which parent is starting o loose relations with everyone around her because they've had enough? britney.

and your saying kevin is a drug addict, a terrible father and britney is more capable to care for the federline children? Now thats comedy.

Anonymous said...

Kevin will surely winn this custody battle. Yes, he is the great father!!!!!!

Anonymous said...

If Kevin's attorney called it, it has nothing to do with the rumor about Kevin. There are several about Britney, maybe it's one of those.

Anonymous said...

How would the kids know he's a drug addict, you moron? They're too young to understand. Which is probably why KFake lights up in front of them.

Fresno wigger, living the high life.

Anonymous said...

Some people are so desperate to believe the worst of Kevin. It's kind of pathetic.

Anonymous said...

now samantha, your comment is ignorantng. thanks for taking the time to point out some of the paparazzi moments of brit. of course if kev is jumping up and down accusing brit of stuff, the court has to check it out. let's face it, neither of them are angels by any means. the difference is that britt already knew she had a problem and went in rehab, kev's problem is he's in denial. he hasn't entered rehab cuz he don't think he has a problem -- he thinks everything he's doning is right. if he's soooo concerned about the boys health/safety, why doesn't he quit smoking? quit drinking? quit having big parties at his house with his 'so called' posse? also, why haven't we seen him yet in pics with the boys? he's a big loser, and all you want to do is defend him. oh, and in reference to brit 'flashing' who cares? are you jealous? are u upset u aren't in demand like she is? whatever.

Anonymous said...

excuse me.... correction in line one: ignorant.