Right, he wasn't a "great dad" when he hooked up with Britney Spears. She complained left and right that he abandoned the children, doesn't have a job, and didn't see them on a regular basis...GREAT father material there!!
Let me get this straight. He left a pregnant woman to go partying around the globe with another woman. He didn't pay child support. He wasn't in the picture with his other two kids until it came time for photo ops with Britney and his little girl with Shar frolicking in the pool and Britney proudly cooing that she was an awesome stepmother (never mind that they weren't married yet, so she wasn't a stepmother). And he only started sniffing around his other two kids, like a dog in heat, after he and Britney split. As she has stated before the divorce that he saw the children "we he could...usually 2-3 times a month".So Shar Jackson's word should be credible because she didn't enforce a father paying what is mandatory under the law for his children, and because she took an "oh well" attitude regarding the father not being there for her two children until it was suitable and desirable for him and suitable and desirable for her, publicity-wise?Anyone want to explain to me why that makes her word on his NEXT two children mean anything credible when she chose to father HER children with THIS loser?
She once said he was a great dad but not a great boyfriend, leaving his kids mother doesn't make him a bad father, in fact if he stayed with her and they were unhappy that wouldn't have been good for anyone.As for not paying money, how do you know for a start? Either way, money doesn't make a good dad, love and care do.
^ Seeing your kids "when you can...2-3 times a month" does not a good father make! Neither does leaving your, what, 2 yr old daughter with her pregnant mother so that you can party around Europe for 3 months! Sorry that doesn't qualify as "great dad" material either!Nor does not taking financial responsibility of any children you happen to make. Children have the right to have their basic needs taken care of... like food, water, shelter, clothing...all of which BOTH PARENTS are to provide!! He had money from the day he met Spears...yet Jackson has stated numerous times that she doesn't receive money from him (and that throughout their relationship he couldn't get many jobs). It wasn't until 3? months ago that Jackson stated Federline started paying for the children's school...and what they are like 4 and 5 now.
^Do you have kids? It's easy to sit at a computer and judge when it's not you. I wouldn't stay with someone just cos we had kids together.
^Yes I have kids, 3 in fact...and I am not for parents staying together if their relationship is shitty! Because oftentimes, it gets taken out on the children!! But, that has NOTHING to do with Federline essentially "dropping" his daughter in favor of gallivanting around Europe! Even Jackson has stated the Federline LIED about where and what he was doing! He up and left his daughter and unborn son to go party hardy!!! That has absolutely nothing to do with his relationship with Shar! It speaks more of him as a man and as a father! Plus, seeing the children "when he can...2-3 times a month"...give me a break. Unless under extreme circumstances parents should see their child at least a few times a week...and considering Federline wasn't doing anything for the first 6 months of his relationship with Spears...he could have seen the children everyday!!! And let's face it...If he truly wanted to he could have carved time out for each of his children...yet he didn't!
He didn't go to Europe to party, he went to be with Britney!I think it's unfair to say he never sees them as we don't have a clue how often he does, they don't take pics of him going there.
^ He went there to party and partake in the money train that is known as Britney Spears...don't fool yourself! Either way it still doesn't say much about him...He left his young daughter and unborn child for MONTHS to go chase some ass!!? Real great there!
Maybe Britney lied to him by telling him it was a video shoot too. You Britney fans shouldn't call Kevin a liar!
Well whether he went there to party it up and use Britney's money is a matter of opinion, I think he fell in love with her and the only way to be with her was to go with her.
^^ Maybe she didn't sweetheart...She went to Europe for a tour and plans for a video were not made until weeks after the European leg was done. Nice try though! Beyond that Kevin stated previously that he went on tour to see and spend time with Britney...no work involved.^It really doesn't matter WHY he went to Europe...The fact remains that he left his 2 yr old daughter and unborn child high and dry for MONTHS so that he could cavort with a woman...Who cares if he fell in love or not! It has nothing to do with him being a decent parent! If you have to choose between a piece of ass (regardless of if you love them) or your young daughter and nearly born son...you'd choose the piece of ass? Doesn't sound like a fine, upstanding parent to me...I'd understand a few days, but MONTHS! Months away from your impressionable daughter and nearly born son...Give me a break! What if Shar had complications? Or Kori had an accident...Daddy WOULDN'T be there....he was too busy frolicking with a money train!!
Would the person who keeps saying 2-3 times a month please look it up, that is not what she said. Look for the Keith Ablow show.Shar has always said Kevin was a good father. She wasn't thrilled with the way he took off and went on tour with Britney, but she's always talked about how close he is with the kids.Whenever Shar says something like this it inspires these big long essays about why Kevin isn't a good father. Shar would know, why don't you just take her word for it. It's not like you've ever met Kevin.
^ She gave an interview to WENN stating that Britney kept Kevin from his kids, that he was busy with work and that he saw them 2-3 times a month. The exact quote is somewhere in the other comments of another article! Everyone from MSN,FoxNews, Yahoo, MTV, CNN and the like reported on it when it happened!
^Shows what kids of a man/father he is when he lets a woman tell him if and when he can't see his kids.
^Give it up already. Kevin didn't have a choice. He was in love with Britney, and couldn't do anything about Shar anyway. She probably tricked him into getting her pregnant.
Give what up? He wasn't man enough to see and raise his own damn kids? You've got to be fucking kidding.
He DOES see and raise his own kids. Even when he was his busiest right when his album was released he said he talked to them on the phone all the time.
Maybe at the time of him working a lot he didn't see them much, that doesn't mean the same goes for now.
^^ Talking to them on the phone DOES NOT constitute as "spending time with them" or "parenting" them. I know of plenty of dead beats who talk to their kids every weekday night at 6:30 pm....Talking to them and seeing them on occasion is NOT actually RAISING them!
I was talking about when he was at his busiest. Lots of parents have careers that take them away from their kids sometimes, it's something that lots of parents make work. Britney was joining him lots of times too, up until the end, when he was basically waiting for her to do so and she filed for divorce instead.
Uh correct me if I wrong (but, I know I'm not because I have pictorial/video evidence) but was Kevin busy the first few months of SP's life...NO! Yet, he was partying every weekend! Was he ever spotted with his child? UH...in 2 fucking years...3 times!!! Federline was "so busy" working on his CD that he didn't have really any time to spend with his children (He admitted this!)....so explain to me how seeing your children every once in a while and "talking to them on the phone" constitutes parenting? How spending an hour with them every few days suddenly makes you a "great parent"? It doesn't matter if Spears took the children to see their father while he was "busy"...He wasn't actually caring for them at the time, the mother was...they just got to "visit" daddy while he "was busy working"!By the way, if Kevin had any proof that Britney was endangering the children or unnecessarily risking them he would have filed a definite motion by now! Like a temporary removal of custody or a motion for supervised visits while in her care!
The tabs say it all: Britney should not be taking care of the kids. She's a bald, drug-crazed has-been!
^ Except that the tabloids have no conclusive proof and they are inadmissible in court! Once again, if he had anything there'd have been more definitive action taken already. You don't leave children in that situation even for a day...you file for emergency custody and get them out.
Just because Kevin isn't taking the kids out walking down the street surrounded by paps like Britney does does not mean he isn't spending lots of time with them. In fact, one of his objections is that Britney continues to expose them to that and it isn't particularly safe.He has the kids just as much as Britney and he's never photographed with them. When the paps were surrounding his house and the helicopters were flying by he still managed to take the kids to rehab to visit Britney without them being photographed.You're making all kinds of assumptions based on what you saw in the tabloids when they were married, ironically enough.
^ I've never said he doesn't spend time with them NOW! I've stated that during the course of their marriage he admittedly was too "busy" to actually contribute to the parenting of his children... and for all the times he was followed by the photogs while they were married (which they admit they don't follow him that much anymore because he doesn't sell)...there is a big whopping 3 pictures! Yet, he managed to be photographed multiple times thru out the day (while married) going to the studio/picking up cigs/partying....while Spears was constantly photographed with the children.It has nothing to do with whether he is "seen" out with them or not NOW...He admittedly wasn't around much actually caring for the children prior to Spears attending rehab!
It's the same thing when they were married. Britney was the one going out being photographed with the kids because she was trying to create an image. Kevin wasn't, in fact he was playing along with the whole "America's Most Hated" thing. But it's all images, it has nothing to do with what happened at home. Yes, Kevin said at one point he wasn't getting to see the kids as much as he wanted but that was just before his album came out and he was flying around doing all kinds of interviews. It was only a temporary situation.
^ thank you. ignorant ppl don't seem to see that. Even his ex says hes a great dad. Just because paps arent following him every second he is with the kids doesnt mean he doesnt see then. Why is Britneys parents seeing the kids at kevins hosue? whats wrong with Britney's place? britney is a fuck up. Understand that your idol is no longer who she used 2 be. how stupid do you ppl get??
Post a Comment