Thursday, July 26, 2007

Britney takes kids to Vegas without permission

Britney Spears Goes to Vegas with Brother & Kids
THURSDAY JULY 26, 2007 06:15 PM EDT

Amid concerns from her family about her recent behavior, Britney Spears is moving on – taking the kids to Las Vegas.

The pop star, joined by her brother Bryan, flew in a private plane to Sin City on Wednesday afternoon with kids Sean Preston, 22 months, and Jayden James, 10 months.

No word on what, exactly, Spears plans to do while in town, but sources tell PEOPLE she went to dinner at the Country Club at the Wynn Las Vegas. She also made special arrangements to have her hotel room childproofed for the visit.

The trip could also pose some problems for any custody battle with ex-husband Kevin Federline: Under California law, neither parent is allowed to take a child out of state without written permission from the other – or by obtaining a court order. According to a source close to Federline, Spears failed to notify her ex or his attorney, Mark Vincent Kaplan, that she was taking the children to Las Vegas.

A lawyer for Spears did not respond to calls for comment.

Source: people.com

18 comments:

Anonymous said...

she's just like paris...she doesn't think rules apply to her. she should lose custody of those children...they're just an accessory to her. she doesn't know what it takes to raise a child!

Anonymous said...

its already been stated that this is not true so you people should get your facts straight before you post

Anonymous said...

where does it say that it is not true ? on a die hard britney fan site ? of course it is going to be disproved on her fan sites, all her fan sites are no more reliable than any other " source ".

f*** off, and go back to your " positive, delusional fan sites .

Anonymous said...

Maybe Brit and the kids will visit that porno film whore that KFed was banging. Oh, I forgot. He liked her for her personality.

Anonymous said...

Kendra Jade, the ex-porn star, denied the stupid rumors on her web site a long time ago, but I suppose means nothing to the people who want to believe it.

Anonymous said...

Of course Kendra Jade denied it. She's not going to owe up to banging a married fuck buddy who patronizes her side business. Oh yeah, there's no prostitution in Vegas, and KFed was there to take in the shows. What a scumbag, you KFed idiots ignore the obvious.

Anonymous said...

again, another brit fan in denial, just like their icon.

believe what you want, there is not one pic of kevin with another woman anywhere at anytime.

unlike your " icon " making out in public with JR.

and you bet there are cameras in vegas.

Anonymous said...

kevin just wants her money ...he is a lazy bum and does not want to work....we all had our britney moments. what about shar take her kids she is having pregnancy test done on the internet and begging for cameras to follow her . kevin work to feed shar kids don't try to get brit to do it plus feed hers!!!!!

Anonymous said...

i am not even going to bother with you last poster.

first off you made no sense.

so perhaps you should master the english language before you speak.

Anonymous said...

If this was at all true...considering she has now been there 2 days (as of Wed. late afternoon)...at anytime after Federline/Kaplan/anyone associated with Federline could have let him know and as of Thursday morning 9AM he could have filed papers in LA County Court stating she broke the agreement and has essentially "ran off with their kids"...which translates into Spears loosing, at least temporarily, custody and possibly visitation rights (typically for about 2 weeks).

As that has not happened and the fact that it has been 48 hours and no legal activity...I'm gonna go with the assumption that Federline had some knowledge of this trip....otherwise he is just uncaring.

Anonymous said...

It's just like all those other "sources" close to Federline that stated that he would get full custody and that he had filed an emergency appeal, right?

What happened to not posting gossip...and obviously if it is unconfirmed...and says the word "source" it is gossip...regardless of what media is reporting it. CNN reported that there was an emergency petition in March and obviously that wasn't true. So regardless of the media outlet...if it says "source" or remains unconfirmed it is still gossip.

Anonymous said...

There's a lot going on behind the scenes that we don't know, legally and otherwise. An emergency petition may have been considered or even filed for all we know, or maybe they managed to work things out without it.

What does seem clear is that Britney continues to hurt her case. Even going to rehab didn't need to be a huge negative strike against her, if she had handled it correctly she could have shown that she wants to improve herself and that she's committed to being a better person for herself and her kids. She's not showing that to the judge at all. Instead she's lashing out at everyone around her and acting like she has no responsibility to anyone. I can't think that there would be any judge impressed by that. It's certainly not good for the boys.

Anonymous said...

I really think they should have joint custody. That would be the absolute best for the kids.

Anonymous said...

9:03AM, I agree with you that the ideal situation would be joint custody, however, Britney continues to place the children in these types of situations because she doesn't think, or thinks of herself first. That little trip to Vegas was for Britney. And no, I don't think the paps should be that close to children but Britney knows what a swarm of paps she always has around her, why would she place her children in that kind of situation. She thinks of herself first!

Anonymous said...

^^^ Except that if any legal documentation was filed it would be in the court of records...which believe me it is not! Their court records aren't sealed....the only thing that is remotely sealed is the skeletal divorce agreement. A legal petition would be public record and would be on the court's agenda (if one was ever filed)!

Federline isn't helping his portion of the case either b/c if any of the rumors circulating Spears is remotely true and he does nothing to stop/change/bar her from harming the children (which I would like to point out she hasn't done) then the judge would ask why he let someone who he believes incapable and harmful around the children. Also, he had 2 days to file for custody (if she in fact broke their agreement) and he didn't. That isn't going to fly with any judge I know. When someone takes your child without consent and you think they are unable to properly care for them...you file immediately and get the police/courts involved to prevent such a thing from ever occurring.

Anonymous said...

^^Those children have been hunted since conception! Nothing short of moving to another country or a deserted island is going to change that! The way the Pap and the bodyguard acted is not a reflection upon Spears...she cannot control other people nor can she predict what will occur. The boys have been out and about and even to Vegas numerous times and around Paps numerous times without anything like this occurring. It is not Spears' fault that 2 Paps got way to close or that security acted the way he did.

Spears hasn't harmed either child nor did she intentionally put either in danger. Is she having issues right now? Without a doubt, but unless she harms or show intent to harm or neglect her children they aren't going to be taken away. She hasn't shown intent to neglect nor harm either child. She might not make the brightest decisions, but she hasn't mistreated/harmed/neglected/ignored her children (which would be grounds for Kevin to het custody).

By the way, her going out while the boys aren't with her(which I haven't heard of her doing lately)or her rash decisions to go swimming in the ocean without a suit on have no bearings on her ability when her children are with her. Her attorney could argue (quite well I might add) that what she does on "free time" doesn't reflect how she is with her children. Which is true...Plenty of parents do "stupid or rash" things when the children are away and rarely does anything get done about it. Until Spears harms her children....well she is entitled to have them. If Kevin Federline had a slightest doubt that they were in some danger he should do something about it. Considering he hasn't, it gives me pause...beyond the fact that I've yet to see pictures in the last 3/3 months that show Spears harming or incapable of properly caring for her children.

Anonymous said...

^Money makes you do.....NOTHING.

Anonymous said...

Kevin doesn't give a shit about kids. Look how he left Shar after he knocked the silly bitch up for the second time, and then didn't visit the little bastards because "Britney wouldn't let him".