Saturday, December 02, 2006

Preview of Shar and Jason on Dr. Keith Ablow - Monday

Britney Spears and Kevin Federline's exes have joined forces again to chat about the couple's recent split on US TV.

Jason Alexander, who was briefly married to Spears, and Shar Jackson, who is the mother of two of Federline's children, have both spoken briefly about the pending divorce battle, but now they've sat down with TV talk show host Dr Keith Ablow to comment further.

The couple, who were once linked romantically earlier this year, taped the interview yesterday. It will air on Monday.

During the chat, Jackson reveals she thinks her ex will fight hard for custody of the two sons he had with Spears.

She says, "He loves his kids and I'm sure he's probably scared that Britney might take the kids and go back to Louisiana or go somewhere and he might not see them."

Alexander reveals he spoke to Spears just after the split was announced, when she called to urge him to watch what he said to the media.

He recalls, "Actually, it was really short. How'd she put it: "Don't say anything you'd regret."

Source: uk.news.yahoo.com

JACKSON: 'SPEARS STOPPED FEDERLINE FROM SEEING KIDS'

BRITNEY SPEARS' former love rival SHAR JACKSON has accused the pop star of keeping her estranged husband KEVIN FEDERLINE away from his kids. The actress claims Spears was so needy when she became a mum to Federline's son SEAN PRESTON, she wouldn't entertain the thought of the rapper spending time with the two kids he had with Jackson. She says, "He was in a relationship where he had to respect boundaries. And the other person probably felt that their family should be the focus of what goes on in their household. "He couldn't come over as much as he would like to. If he wasn't working he would come over to see the kids two or three times a month." Federline, who split from Spears last month (NOV06), is already trying to make up for lost time with his children by Jackson - he reportedly spent Thanksgiving Day (23NOV06) with his ex-girlfriend and their kids.

Source: contactmusic.com

48 comments:

Anonymous said...

They need to stop commenting on their ex's lives. In my mind, they just want to make a quick buck/ keep their 15 minutes going. It's very easy to say no to things like this, so why can't they just do it.

Anonymous said...

This love rectangle would make Jerry Springer proud! I love Britney's veiled threat ("Don't say anything you'll later regret")... or was she trying to offer sage wisdom of how to deal with the media? Hard to say, as the public is still gagging over her panty-less crotch.

Anonymous said...

You can see Brad Pitt's and Jude Law's penis online too. Big whoop, it's a vagina. Would I wear a skirt without underwear...no, but people are making way too much out of this. It reminds me of elementary school when people would laugh if someone said penis or vagina.

Anonymous said...

If Shar did say the Britney wouldn't allow Kevin to see the kids thing than it's nobody's fault but Kevin's. Your kids come first and if it was me I'd say toughshit, Brit I'm going to see my kids.

Anonymous said...

Perhaps he was afraid she would cut him off from Sean P? What I don't get is why you try to cut your husband's children, from a previous relationship, out of his life? It's not going to help your realtionship, its just going to make it worse.

Anonymous said...

Britney might not have been happy with time he spent with his kids, but if a man really wants to see his children, nothing and no one will stop him.

Anonymous said...

Exactly! This "somebody made me do it" sounds like kindergarten crap.

" I wanted to ,but she wouldn't let me" He made me depressed

Please! How can there be so damn many VICTIMS in the world.

For rich peopls, these folks have real problems with boundaries.

Anonymous said...

She had no right telling him not to see his kids.Some women does that.she does look like the kind of person.She very selfish telling some one not to see their kids is very curel.That why her marriage ended.It does make a relationship wrose.All the wickedness she did to people in their live is what hunting her currently that why she can not find happyness and a complete mess now.It will continue to hunt her until she can ask these people who she hurt for forgiveness.

Anonymous said...

Maybe Kevin made the excuse to Shar because he wanted to cover his own ass? Why is it that we belive Shar only when she says good things about Kevin. She said Kevin cheated on her, yet everyone calls her a liar because Kevin said they broke up. Well couldn't Shar be lying now too?

Anonymous said...

I have to say I find the logic some of you use to be utterly ridiculous. First of all, whomever runs this site claims they will not post gossip and garbage....Obviously, that only applies when said gossip is about Kevin's soon to be ex-wife.

Here's a thought, these 2 fame seeking people will say whatever they want to make themselves relevant to a situation that has NOTHING to do with them. AND since when has what the exgirlfriend said become gospel? Who knows if what she says is true...which given the fact that there are numerous occassions where all of the woman's 4 kids were with Brit and Kevin, I tend to not believe, "She wouldn't let him see his kids. Poor him!" That doesn't seem to fly with her previous statements that Kevin saw or had the kids every other weekend and when she needed a break.

On to Jason, about a week after the divorce became public he did a video saying he hasn't spoken to his "friend" since the next morning in Vegas. Now, he changes his story and says she called him a few days before the announcement to tell him not to "say anything he would regret." Funny, make up your mind and stick to it.

I normally don't care about such things as this, but if you say your not going to post gossip...and let's be honest here, what Shar and Jason say at this point is nothing more than hersay and spin (unless you can prove what they say is true) and soundbits to get their names in the media, I suggest you stick with it.

There is a better way to go about promoting the person you like, than posting things that make others look bad to make said person look better.

Anonymous said...

Um, how is Yahoo News UK recapping some of what Jason and Shar said on the Dr. Keith Ablow show gossip? I could maybe understand contactmusic.com being considered as gossip; but Yahoo news usually gets there info from the same places as most of the other legitimate news websites do.

Also you can't classify what two people say as gossip since its been said on camera. If it where a third or fourth party saying that these two said this and that then it would be gossip.

As for Jason talking to Britney, granted she may not have had any contact with him since the Vegas incident; but she's smart enough to know that the tabs and almost everyone else is going to come looking for him when this all went down, because they want to know what he thinks about it. Perhaps her words were a warning or maybe just a professional tip at handling everything. You never know with her.

It's funny when Britney fans run here and cry fowl and say that this place is biased (its a fan site, its going to be a little bit biased no matter how hard you try to be diplomatic), but yet the same thing is going on, on Britney fansites and messageboards. Shouldn't you be running to those sites as well and preaching fairness and diplomacy?

Why not call it what it really is, you don't like that fact that there's something slightly negative about Britney on this site while you have no problem with anything negative about Kevin being said on a Britney or any site.

As far as vagina exposure goes. I think the main reason why everyone's disgusted is due to the fact that she's not wearing panties, it the fact that she didn't have the presence of mind (or maybe common sense) to know that when you're not wearing underware you keep your legs together to prevent exposing yourself to people. And yes you can get out of a car with your legs together and dignity intact.

Anonymous said...

A) Britney's not wearing panties because she's trying to earn brownie points with someone disgusting. Someone who is user her to advance her own agenda. Britney is a jackass.

B) Britney is obviously not taking care of her kids. As a father, I know that you have to be there for the 3 a.m. or 4 a.m. feedings. But you know what? I loved it. It's the time you bond together, and you'll forever treasure those moments. Maybe not the doodads left in the diaper, but still... Britney is a jackass.

C) Kevin is just as bad. If I divorced, the first thing I would make clear on the FIRST DATE with anyone afterward: My little one comes first. Sorry, it's not negotiable. If I remarried, I'd simply bring it up again. Again, "NO" is not an answer. You wouldn't be able to prevent me from seeing my little one. In other words, Kevin is a jackass too.

Anonymous said...

If a man really wants to see his children, he'd go see them.

END OF STORY.

Anonymous said...

If a man really wants to see his children, he'd go see them.

END OF STORY.

Anonymous said...

If someone demands that you choose between her/him or your children- then YOU are the one making the stupid decision by staying with that person.

If a man really wants to see his children, he'd go see them.

END OF STORY.

Anonymous said...

Wow so now it's Britney's fault Kevin did see his kids? Yeah right. He is a grown man if he was any type of man he never would have left Shar in the first place to be with Briney. It doesn't matter if they weren't together. It wasn't the time for him to be fucking around with Britney.

But bottom line is those two idiots need to shut up.

Anonymous said...

People are saying "I thought you didn't post gossip" because that is what the site owner said. She doesn't post garbage and doesn't post rumors. But she does when it's garbage about Briney. You should be thanking Britney for introducing you to Kevin. Just like everyone sane in the world should be blaming Britney for unleashing FedEX

Anonymous said...

I posted about the logic on this board and since someone responded directly... First, I, in no way, can be considered a "fan" of Britney Spears...more of a "watcher" of all things in the media. In fact, I liked Kevin because when I met him, he was pretty cool...this all being about 6 months ago.

Just because 2 people who have no real business with say something...it doesn't make it true. Unless it comes from the source (that being the people involved) it makes it hersay and gossip. I could go claim that my husbands ex doesn't let him see his daughter and I could claim as much to anyone, camera or no camera, who would listen....does that make it true...? Possibly or not! It's still gossip regardless.

By your claim that you can't classify it as gossip because A)its on camera and B)you don't believe they are third or fourth parties. So anything said on camera is taken as fact now? It's a claim, not a proven fact...therefore, gossip.
Here's something: Just because someone says something, whether on camera, in a letter, on tv, radio, hell shouted in front of millions...it is still gossip and unproven claims unless the person doing the talking in one of the two parties involved. Kevin telling Shar "My wife won't let me..." can be tantamount to making an excuse.
Agian, it could be true...but unless one of the two parties involves states it as such it remains gossip and hersay told by third and forth parties. Futhermore, the two are not the parties involved in the relationship (In fact, Shar was in a video with Jason saying she doesn't know or discuss about their relationship) thus, that makes them third and forth parties to the information and therefore, what they say is hersay and gossip. You can't go to court and say "So and so told me this so that must make it true" It has to be able to be proven and the person whom said such and such must be unable (by death, illness,etc.) to state it for themselves.

My point with the Jason thing is that 1-2 weeks AFTER the divorce was announced he is on camera multiple times saying he hasn't spoken to Britney since her people booted him. Now he is saying he has spoke to her just before the divorce was announced. How can you 1-2 weeks after say you haven't spoken to someone in years and then almost 3 1/2 weeks later say, "Oh but I have spoken to her and this is what she said." You've either spoken to her before the announcement or you haven't...can't have it both ways. And, thus, if it is true he spoke to her before then he lied on camera multiple times since by saying he hasn't spoken to her or he is now lying claiming he spoke to her before so that people give him attention.

I have no problem with anyone critizing Britney or anyone else whose in the spotlight...hell, I critize them myself...my issue was that the owner/poster of this board said multiple times (its even in the updates section) that they were not going to post gossip. Gossip is gossip regardless of who it is about. You can't say your going to not do something and have it apply only when you deem it. Otherwise, it should be "I'm not going to post the gossip about what is going on, unless it helps Kevin." By stating she would not post claims about what is going on, it applies to both parties.

FYI:I don't visit britney fansites, thank you as they are a bit extreme in their devotion. I stick to a celebrities messageboard where I do point out the faulty logic of some.

I didn't mention those pictures, but I find them extremly distasteful. Obviously the girl needs to remember to put some undergarments on and that photogs are going to be everywhere she goes. That being said, (and this applies to everyone celebrity or not) how many times have any of you done something your not proud of? Or something happened that you did not mean to? Perhaps an shameful, distasteful act caught by camera? I can tell you, I have some pictures taken by friends when I was out parting and drunk that I am not proud of. Almost everyone has done things that are awful to others...no one lives a perfect, mistake -free glass house, so we really truly cannot sit and say "She's an awful parent. Slut and so forth"
The "well they should no better they are celebs" doesn't fly either b/c at the end of the day, they are human and make mistakes. I'm sure if everyone had cameras documenting their lives there would be some things each of us would cringe at, regardless of how long we've had cameras following us.

Anonymous said...

Just a little something I would like to point out:
No one can say that Britney is not caring for her kids with 100% certainty unless you live with her. The same can be said for Kevin.
If we are going by the fact that she has partied for something like 2 or is it 3 weeks at night, the same can be said for Kevin (for all the documentation of two years and admittance on his part that he goes/went out) or any other parents who do the same. Just b/c it is not a choice you or I would make, it doesn't mean they are bad or unfit whatsoever. Bad and unfit goes to the scum I see working for Family and Protective Services whom leave their children for days without proper arrangements for food and care or those that abuse and hurt their children.
I am not the caseworker of the Federline's but, from both Kevin and Britney pre-divorce, the children are happy and well cared for and from all reports the family has a full-time nanny. Is that the best way to raise children? It's personal choice. I had a nanny fulltime growing up and still saw my parents duing the day when they finished with work and whatever and they did go out at night (not to this extent, but still) Does that make my parents or any others unfit? or just fortunate enough to provide my siblings and I will 24 hr. care while being able to enjoy adult things still.

Bottomline, no one can say without a shadow of a doubt (unless one of you is kevin himself) that any of the things reported are true. Thus it's gossip reported by "inside" people. The negative comments and such are all sad and irrelavent at the end of the day because no one knows.

And I find it hard to believe that if there was any shimmer of a shadow that Britney was neglecting, unstable or unable to provide for their children, Kevin, if not Kevin's lawyer, would file an immediate temporary custody suit. No one who loves and seeks the best interest of the children would leave them in a situation if it seemed or was deemed unhealthy.
In fact, here, if he knew the childen where in any sort of danger or unstable situation (as these "reports" are claiming) and did nothing ,he could be held responsibly as an accessory if anything happened...b/c he had prior knowledge that she is unstable and unable to properly care for them and did nothing still.

Alison said...

I never said I won't post "garbage or rumors", the truth it we can never be 100% sure of just about anything when it comes to Kevin and Britney. I said I would post it if I figured it had a 50% chance or greater of being true. Contact Music is not always right but when quoting a TV show I think they usually are right. Anyway, we will be able to verify it on Monday.

Anonymous said...

Alison,

The point that person was trying to make is that regardless if Shar or Jason said those things, it is still gossip as they are not the two people involved.
Shar can claim that Kevin told her that Britney came home drunk everynight and was a total wreck, but unless said comments come from Kevin and or Britney, it is still gossip.
I or anyone else could go and tell Shar that I know for a fact that Britney neglects her children and if she then turns around and says as much to a tv show that wants juicy tidbits....it wouldn't be gossip anymore b/c Shar said it on Nat'l TV? I don't think so! It still would be gossip as it would be reported not from the souce. The source being Kevin and Britney themselves.

Anonymous said...

Just a little something I would like to point out:
No one can say that Britney is not caring for her kids with 100% certainty unless you live with her. The same can be said for Kevin.
If we are going by the fact that she has partied for something like 2 or is it 3 weeks at night, the same can be said for Kevin (for all the documentation of two years and admittance on his part that he goes/went out) or any other parents who do the same.



You're definitely not a parent. A parent would know better than to post such utter stupidity. And I mean "parent" as a label deserving some degree of merit. If you were a parent with two babies and went out at odd hours to party, then you're far too immature and self-centered to be a responsible parent.

And that's my problem with both Kevin and Britney. It is clear that they are parents only by virtue of biology. What disgusts me most is that they are role models, and that some of the more dimwitted fans will now buy into the age old moral hazard of teen parenthood: You can party all you want, and raise kids.

Anonymous said...

Britney kept Kevin from his kids? That has to be the lamest shit I have ever heard. If Kevin stayed away from Kori and Kaleb, that was ALL ON HIM. He is their father and should have been like "Fuck that!" and went to see his damn children. All that tells me is that Kevin needed an excuse to avoid and he gave Shar one or he is a weak human and none of his kids should have to be in the presense of someone who can be so easily convinced to not be a father.

Of course all of this could be utter bullshit that Shar is spewing. I mean really, she is an actress right? Maybe she should start auditioning again and jump on the Britney Train she has been riding.

Anonymous said...

Didn't Shar say a little while ago that Kevin sees his kids all the time? Umm I'm sensing a lie somewhere.

Anonymous said...

You're definitely not a parent. A parent would know better than to post such utter stupidity. And I mean "parent" as a label deserving some degree of merit. If you were a parent with two babies and went out at odd hours to party, then you're far too immature and self-centered to be a responsible parent.

And that's my problem with both Kevin and Britney. It is clear that they are parents only by virtue of biology. What disgusts me most is that they are role models, and that some of the more dimwitted fans will now buy into the age old moral hazard of teen parenthood: You can party all you want, and raise kids.


Funny, that you should say that because in fact, I am a parent of twin boys (10 months) and a little girl (32 months). I was responding to the fact that people seem to know with conviction that Britney and Kevin's kids are neglected by them going out at night. Just because parents go out at night, it does not mean they are not caring for their children or irresponsible, especially if there is a trained person watching over the children, which would imply she cared and was responsible enough to make sure they were watched over. There are many who don't even take the time for that.

I wasn't saying their behavior was right or acceptable, I was saying that people cannot make assumptions about other's situations. Sort of how you assumed I was not a parent. Same thing....b/c you think it is unacceptable to believe that parents can care for their children ( and I mean care in the sense that they make sure their child is cared for) even if they go out. They have a nanny who, I'm reaching here...looks after and cares for the children on Britney and Kevin's orders, so Britney is looking after her children's welfare. It's irresponsible to go out without making plans regarding the welfare of the children...not when you do!

Yes, I have gone out at night and hung out with friends. Does that make me "immature", "stupid" or "self-centered"? Hell NO! Especially when I see to it that my kids are watched over. Sometimes parents need a night out where they can be just themselves and not "mama". In fact, there are studies supporting the fact that parents do need time to themselves where they focus not on being someone's mother or father, but on being adults, especially if both parents have high stress or conflicting work schedules.

Do I think that Britney and Kevin's actions are unacceptable? For me, yes, they are. I could not go out for nights at a time and not feel guilty. But, if it works for them and they have no qualms and their children are not in any physical, mental, or emotional danger... it's their call. Now, we could argue the mental and emotional trappings of parents going out at night, but surfice to say if the children are happy, well adjusted, and have a bond with their caretakers, they are in better shape than hundreds of thousands of others.

Going out at night, a bad parent does not make (in the eyes of the law) so long as the child is safe.

The point is we have no right to judge others for their actions, even if we don't agree with them.
Who made these people rolemodels? Maybe we should take umbarge with them?

I've seen cases where parents thought parenting is just fun and games and that they could forget their children when its play time and it's not pretty. The children suffer from attatchment disorders and often behavioral ones as well... Those people should not be having babies, but they do and the children suffer so until laws forbidding such things from occuring are enacted, others try to make the best of a sad situation.

Anonymous said...

No Alison you don't get it at all. Just because Shar says that does NOT make it fact! Just before they divorced Kevin said she said all the time he saw the kids. Kevin said on Much Music he was too busy to see everyone. Obviously Shar does not like Britney. Any kind of man worth ANYTHING at all would not put up with that mess in regards to this children. Shar said the kids went with Kevin when she needed some time off of watching them. Kevin said he has no interest in actually raising kids daily. Britney has spent money on those kids and spent time with the kids. Shar said she doesn't like to meet SPF because that's not her family. Now tell me where all that adds up to = Britney is needy and won't let Kevin see his kids? During that time he was out away from the baby and Britney he could have very well gone to see the kids.

If you want to be anti-Britney go right ahead, but please don't pretend to be fair and don't pretend you aren't skipping bad things about Kevin and posting only negative things about Britney. You still have yet to say how Britney's less than 2 weeks of going out is equal to Kevin's nearly two years of leaving his wife and child at home.

Anonymous said...

You, a parent of twins, defending Britney partying at odd hours?

Me thinks you're 17, and living at home. No mature parent with babies thinks that way.

Alison said...

I agree that just because Shar or Jason say something does not mean it is fact. Same could be said for Britney and Kevin for that matter. But it is worth posting on this site, and you can decide for yourself what you believe.

Anonymous said...

http://flynetonline.com/home/2006/12/britney-spears-takes-sean-preston-to.html

Anonymous said...

It's tough to separate truth from fiction, but you're right Alison, it should be posted.

We need to be mindful that both Jason and Shar have agendas. I can only guess that Jason is enjoying his watching his 15 minutes of fame grow into 30. And as some sharp folks mentioned earlier, Jason did mention that he had been out of contact with Britney since their pathetic marriage in Vegas.

Shar... hard to say. Is she pro-Kevin? Maybe, because I'm sure she wants him to have the means to pay for their children's education. Is she con-Kevin? Maybe, we don't know how she may really feel, as we cannot even draw a bead on how their romance really ended.

Alison said...

^ Yes, I know Britney is cleaning up her act. Honestly, I'm having a hard time trusting Britney's actions. Larry comes into town and does a beautful job of handling her divorce so that just about everyone is cheering for her. Then he leaves and Britney manages to destroy that in a week. Now Larry's back in town to do damage control once again. He takes her house hunting. Britney's taking Sean to the zoo. I'm sure we will soon see lovely pictures of Britney and her two sons. And the public will love her once again.

I'm not saying Britney doesn't love her sons. I'm just saying it's hard to know where the line is between truth and public image. And that's fair to say for Kevin too, I'm sure it's not a coincidence that we frequently see him dressed up now.

Alison said...

Shar said that Kevin was a great parent all along, even when he was married to Britney. I think she does have her reasons for speaking, but Kevin is two of her children's father and it could be for higher motives besides money.

Anonymous said...

No different than Kevin partying in suits and fitted clothing looking very cleaned up. It is all about damage control on both sides. Kevin and Britney lawyers realize image plays a large part and they are just doing their thing.

Anonymous said...

You, a parent of twins, defending Britney partying at odd hours?

Me thinks you're 17, and living at home. No mature parent with babies thinks that way.


This will be my last response to you because it is not worth it. It is not my life so frankly, as long as those children are happy and healthy...great.

Sweety, add years on to age and learn to read a complete post.

Funny, how you throw insults when someone has differing veiws. I am not mature? Great, if it pleases you to think so. No parent would think it is acceptable to go out at night as long as your children are properly cared for? (And I am not talking about all the time. That in itself is a whole other story). I must have missed that memo before I gave birth to all 3 of my kids and it didn't appear in any of the classes and seminars regarding children/parenting I had to take to obtain my degree and get my job.

Agian, while I stated I found both parents behavior questionable in regards to what I would do- I said that it was their lives and who are we to judge what is right and wrong for them? I also said, it was not something I could do. Have I seen people do such things? Yes. Is it the end of the world so long as the children are watched over by a caring adult? No. As long as the children were looked after and loved while the parents went out, it is not as bad as it could be. Some parents do not even get babysitters. Instead, they a)leave their child sleeping at home and go off b) leave the child sleeping in the car while they party c)leave them with incompetent ones.

Here's another lesson for you:
Every parent is DIFFERENT! There is no set in stone rules or views other than to love, provide, and care for your children. While we're at it-Every child is also different! What applies to one person, be they 26 years old, 2.5 years old, or newborn, doesn't always apply to others.

Anonymous said...

Please. Shar has some kind of motive. I don't dislike the woman but she NEEDS to find a career that has nothing to do with Britney freaking Spears. This is getting ridiculous.

Also I am positive that Britney and Kevin love their children, but I do think this divorce was a long time coming.

One thing that always struck me as odd was their timing with Jayden James and Britney's quote about how Kevin reacted

"I'm happy for you"

For you? Cause he was pissed off? I mean I realize that JJ was a "unexpected surprised" but I just get this crazy feeling that they would have been over if JJ happened made a debut.

That being said I really hope things don;t get to nasty. Britney has been partying and enjoying the single life...making some careless mistakes along the way. Kevin has been trying to show people he isn't this gold digging dead beat dad the media claims him to be.

All I know is that Shar and Jason need to stop talking about them because all it does is HURT everyone involved. I mean Shar subtly badmouths Britney and Jason trashtalks Kevin. How is this helpful?

Anonymous said...

"Every parent is different"...

And with that mindless mantra, I give you an underage Britney worshipper who has never been a parent.

Anonymous said...

Shar has no reason to speak. It's none of her business. She said she has no desire to ever meet Kevin's other kids, so this type of thing shouldn't even bother her at all. Jason is just an idiot. I'm just so sick of Britney getting attached to these total money grubbing idiots and how they use her. I wish she could find some real people who want her for her, not of who she is and not for money.

Anonymous said...

You can go out and be responsible. Britney and Kevin could be doing a fine job of working things out, but the media is only showing us crap.

As adults, my husband and I get a babysitter and go out with each other about once a week after the kids are asleep about 8:00 at night. We're back in by 1:-2:00. We eat, we dance, we hang out with adults.

This is healthy for all of us. It doesn't involve getting overtly drunk in public or public nudity.

Occasionally I go out with my girlfriends. We shop, we go out to dinner. Again, none of us have ever flashed a camera man as we've gotten out of the car.

We're busy people with work and the kids. My kids are with someone other than myself about 9 hours a day.

And all the ohter mom's I hang out with are doing the type of things with their time.

All things in moderation.

Anonymous said...

There are two things I see, Kevin is not with his children because he is working which is a fact, we see the schedules and the pics. Britney is not with the kids because she is out every night dancing which is fact because we see the pictures and comments by her and others everyday. Who is watching the children? The only two victims in this tired mess cannot even take care of themselves. Who are they bonding with right now, a nanny? I don't know where Britney goes when the party is over but I do know that people have to sleep and that has to be done in the day when a person is out all night, every night Someone please take care of the children.

Anonymous said...

Before we judge too harshly, lots of kids grow up with parents who can't be with them in the evenings because they are waitresses, or work a hotel desk or a night shift at a plant. Night "day care" is thriving. If the care they receive while they are awake during the day, if they are able to play and and and snuggle with mom and dad during the day, they'll do fine.

Just cause the nasty paparazzi can't get or won't get picutres of the other parts of their lives, doesn't mean it's all parties and flashing the cameras or ex's guessing.

I'm thinking that ex's are generally the LAST people you tell your personal stuff to.

Anonymous said...

what a crummy Christmas for these folks this year.

Anonymous said...

Some folks don't have a choice, due to economic hardship or necessity, and have to leave young children with daycare, nannies, or grandparents.

But somehow I don't think Brit Brit is on the verge of applying for food stamps.

Face it, she's a really crappy excuse for a mother, partying until the wee hours of the morning (that's how her new best friend Paris parties, unless you wish to suspend disbelief). Unless you're like that one fool claiming she parties responsibly with her husband while leaving babies at home, it just doesn't happen. Not if you're a normal human being.

Anonymous said...

Considering she partied about 6 days in 2 years, I'd say she is fine. She has been spending time with her kids and spent her birthday out, but with close personal friends she has known for years. This is only after she spent the day with SPF. I would say leave her alone she is doing fine. She needed to blow off some steam, but seems to be on the right track now.

Anonymous said...

She has a greater responsibility now, and that's to her babies. I think she'll cut down on the partying, since Larry will groom her for sales appeal. Besides, I'm sure the Britney legal team will tell her to cool it as she is jeopardizing her position in the ersatz custody battle (there won't be a battle, just posturing by both sides for a financial settlement).

Anonymous said...

In the new video up at x17, one of the paparazzi asks her if she spoke to kevin or if he wished her a happy birthday and she replies "no never!"

So they aren't talking?

Anonymous said...

"Britney, did Kevin call you?"
"No. Never."

http://x17online.com/celebrities/
britney_spears/you_say_its_your_birthday.php#more

I guess he isn't looking for his kids?

Anonymous said...

writer writes:
"Every parent is DIFFERENT! There is no set in stone rules or views other than to love, provide, and care for your children."

There are standards. There expectations and there are rules of things you must do to provide for a minor child.

Britney is well within those standards as she provides adequate child care when she is unavailable.

Anonymous said...

So it's cool that Brit left the babies with a sitter, while she flashes her crotch late night.

Glad she's got her priorities straight.