Tuesday, December 05, 2006

Cris Judd offers Kevin advice about the divorce

JENNIFER LOPEZ's ex-husband CRIS JUDD is offering KEVIN FEDERLINE advice on how to handle his high-profile divorce from BRITNEY SPEARS. Judd, who is also a former back-up dancer, was married to Lopez for just over a year and sympathises with Federline having to endure his split while in the spotlight. The 37-year-old has moved on since his divorce from Lopez and is now hosting DANCE LIKE WE DO, a new reality TV competition based on the classic film DIRTY DANCING. Judd insists he knows what Federline is experiencing: "It's difficult. Especially going through it in public. "It's all about how you handle yourself. Keep your head up, you know. You have to live day by day now."

Source: contactmusic.com

15 comments:

Anonymous said...

Nice to be reminded that Kevin isn't the first backup dancer to marry a superstar.

Anonymous said...

If Cris is still doing celebrity things, I imagine Kevin will still be around in a few years as well.

Anonymous said...

^
People felt bad for Chris though. I don't think a lot of people feel bad for Kevin.

Plus dancing wise Chris >>>>> Kevin

Anonymous said...

Cris went away because Jennifer paid him to. He's scum.

Anonymous said...

The last writer is an idiot.

The majority of people in the world are sexist. They still beleive a man should be the family caretaker. They still believe that the man should be more financially powerful than the woman.

When a man marries a woman because she's beautiful, because she can dance, because he's strongly physically attracted to her and wants her to be his mate and parent his children- then it doesn't work no one tries to crucify her.

But, man, look at what happens if you substitute a woman into that equation, who mates with a less financially powerful male. THe world hates it, and makes fun of the guys.

Why can't a powerful woman have the same luxury of choice as the guys?

Anonymous said...

prolly cuz all of the dudes are jealous and want to be the man.

Anonymous said...

J.Lo left Cris for Ben, of course he is going to take her ass to the cleaners.

Anonymous said...

Hello!?!

Marriage is a legally binding committment and contract where you purposefully put your assets together. That's what marriage is all about. It is a social and legal commitment.

Did you think it just gave a person a legal bed partner?

Although there is generally some protection for prior assets, like inheritance or money earned BEFORE the wedding, nothing is guaranteed....unless...

An addition legal agreement (known as a pre-nup) changes those circumstances, by outlining specifically what each party should get. If reports about Britney's pre-nup are true, hers was very tight, as one would expect if:
a) you have a good attorney and
b) Kevin married her for love and not money.

That the way it works. The idea that someone can take "someone's ass to the cleaners" is ridiculus.

If you don't like the rules, don't get married.

Anonymous said...

Kevin has a valid claim if he needs assistance to provide a home for his children, if Kevin and Britney are truly working together in trying to set up a good situation for the children.

To allow them to be nurtured in a positive environment in reasonable proximity to each parent, the children might be allowed a living allowance while they we staying with Kevin. It's not Kevin's money per se, it is for the care and protection of the children while they are with him, and God knows the paparatzi and rabid fans are evil enough to kill a princess for a good picture.

In divorce situations with folks with money this happens all the time, even if the parent receives visitation rights instead of full custody.

If there is a worse case scenerio, and Kevin's income is very limited, it doesn't help the children in a divorce to see one parent struggling while the other lives in abosulte luxury, it only adds to the pain.

Anonymous said...

^ Thank-you, well said.

Anonymous said...

Kevin has a valid claim if he needs assistance to provide a home for his children, if Kevin and Britney are truly working together in trying to set up a good situation for the children.


Good point. K-Bred knocked up the nasty pop-tart twice. It doesn't matter that he's shown no interest in raising his other set of kids. At least the kids don't have to see their gold digging dad work hard for a living like real men.

Anonymous said...

Obviously you missed the point.

I'm sorry the concept of cooperative planning between two parents is beyond your thinking.

Sometimes the parent with the most resources (AND IT IS USUALLY THE MAN!)has to bridge the gap to ensure the kids have stability and safety in a broken home situation.

For instance: from man-eating paparazzi. Regular apartment would never work in that situation.

But why should I bother to explain it to someone who just wants to spew.

Anonymous said...

^

Perhaps you missed my point.

K-Bred isn't a real man.

Anonymous said...

Whoever is writing the last few paragraphs about marriage being a legally binding commitment - I agree with you.

There are some who are just out for a reaction, I wouldn't bother too much with them.

Anonymous said...

According to a 2003 survey by the Bureau of Labor Statistics, about a third of wives earn more than their husbands.

That's the most recent data on this subject. Some of those whomen, like Britney make a whole heck of a lot more. More and more women are making up the gap when there is a divorce and children to be raised.